This story has not received a lot of attention, but at the request of the Mayor, City Council is considering a bill that will require police permits for possession and use of environmental air monitoring devices by public health groups, labor unions, environmentalists, community organizations, and university programs. Given the scandal surround the EPA lies of air quality at Ground Zero, the introduction is shocking. Those three muskateers of pointless safety laws: Bloomberg, the NYPD, and City Council, are collaborating on this doozy.
The rational for this stupid proposal? If a lot of independent alarms went off it could create a panic, so the police need to control the monitoring devices out there. That’s just so implausible I’m not going to waste my time writing about it. By this rational the Department of Homeland Security should have been shut down in 2004, after their too-many-to-count false security alert warnings. Code Red Code Red! Amusingly enough DHS proposed this law to NYC - can you say projection?
Dear The Bronx, You’re Screwed
Intro 650, if enacted, will restrict, and could prevent altogether, independent environmental monitoring. So lets think of some of the implications. No air monitoring in neighborhoods with high asthma rates of auto/bus emissions. No air monitoring in the city period of auto emissions. No air monitoring from light or heavy manufacturing or energy plants. No air monitoring at or around construction sites. No air monitoring around disaster sights.
I guess the revelations that the EPA lied about the air quality at Ground Zero, and the liabilities the city faces for rescue workers who have become ill because of their work at Ground Zero has really gotten under the government’s skin.
Oh, but the police will give people a permit. Right. As if. The one thing the NYPD does NOT DO is cooperate.
Its really a joke when the Mayor rolls out his accountability speeches. So next time you file a complaint for hazardous air with 311 you’ll be able to track its rejection on your home computer - Great! Oh, but he’s enforcing parking space - whoop dee do. When it comes to big issues the last thing this Mayor wants is accountability: Real Estate subsidies, Construction and Public Safety, Police compliance with the law. All those have no proper accountability or transparency.
The same goes for Speaker Quinn who let this crap bill get into committee.
The only thing they forgot to include in this bill was a ban on BS meters.
CORRECTION!:I linked to NYC Rubber Room who
suggested Tisch James supports this bill. RubberRoom encouraged readers to “protest the actions of the following members” then listed Tisch James. It’s not clear if RubberRoom is privy to some information that would lead them to conclude Tisch supports this legislation. It more looks like the writer at RubberRoom was just being passionate and not really considering the connection they implied. In doing some follow up I’ve not found anything to suggest whether she does or does not support this. She is on the public safety committee considering the bill, but Tisch James is NOT a sponsor of the legislation. Here are the sponsors:
- Addabbo, Jr., Joseph P.
- Comrie, Jr., Leroy G.
- Fidler, Lewis A.
- Gentile, Vincent J.
- Gonzalez, Sara M.
- Nelson, Michael C.
- Recchia, Jr., Domenic M.
- Stewart, Kendall
- Vallone, Jr., Peter F.
- White, Jr., Thomas
Per the Intro 650 record
Thanks to the commenter who suggested looking into this more. I personally hope Tisch will oppose this bill. I’ve also put a call into her office to try to see if there is any clarity to gain on this, but its worth noting that Tisch is not particularly important to this story at this time and this is making a bit much of it all. I originally mentioned her because it simply struck my attention that she was on RubberRooms list because she is in general one of our better councilors. And she is certainly one we would expect to hear speak out against such legislation.
Read Full Post »